• Nicholas Mazza

The Globalists Mysterious Plot to Steal the 2020 Election. Will it Succeed?

The Democrats are desperate. They know they are going to lose a fair election. That is why they are doing anything they can to create chaos and steal it. Everything leading up to now points to another coup attempt if Trump wins. This time, one much more obvious and blatant. They are already admitting that Trump will probably win on election day in a landslide. But they say, don't worry, we will find mysterious ballots everywhere, thereby flipping the election to Joe Biden.

Apparently, the Globalists, have devised a plot to elect their candidate. Chuck Schumer, recently tweeted this out.

Hilary Clinton recently said that Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstance.

They are already trying to plant the seed in our minds and prepare us for what they are going to do. In summary when Trump wins on election day, they will find a way to steal it days, weeks or months after(mail in balloting) and blame Trump for the chaos. Inevitably and rightly Trump will claim voter fraud on behalf of the Globalists.

The plot is constructed by a group of Democrats and anti-Trump Republicans (Globalists) called Transition Integrity Project and was started “out of concern that the Trump Administration may seek to manipulate, ignore, undermine or disrupt the 2020 presidential election and transition process.”

The irony being the group was designed to do exactly that if Trump wins..

The "Transition Integrity Project" that is behind this coup plot consists of Democrat Party insiders and former Obama and Clinton era officials as well as neoconservative Republicans. It has been revealed that they have been conducting simulations and “war games” regarding different 2020 election “doomsday” scenarios. 

From Zero Hedge:

Per several media reports on the group, called the Transition Integrity Project (TIP), they justify these exercises as specifically preparing for a scenario where President Trump loses the 2020 election and refuses to leave office, potentially resulting in a constitutional crisis. However, according to TIP’s own documentseven their simulations involving a “clear win” for Trump in the upcoming election resulted in a constitutional crisis, as they predicted that the Biden campaign would make bold moves aimed at securing the presidency, regardless of the election result.

This is particularly troubling given that TIP has considerable ties to the Obama administration, where Biden served as Vice President, as well as several groups that are adamantly pro-Biden in addition to the Biden campaign itself. Indeed, the fact that a group of openly pro-Biden Washington insiders and former government officials have gamed out scenarios for possible election outcomes and their aftermath, all of which either ended with Biden becoming president or a constitutional crisis, suggest that powerful forces influencing the Biden campaign are pushing the former Vice President to refuse to concede the election even if he loses.

This, of course, gravely undercuts the TIP’s claim to be ensuring “integrity” in the presidential transition process and instead suggests that the group is openly planning on how to ensure that Trump leaves office regardless of the result or to manufacture the very constitutional crisis they claim to be preventing through their simulations.

Such concerns are only magnified by the recent claims made by the 2016 Democratic presidential candidate and former Secretary of State under Obama, Hillary Clinton, that Biden “should not concede under any circumstances.”

In the TIP’s “clear Trump win” scenario (see page 17), Joe Biden – played in the war game by John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign manager and chief of staff to former President Bill Clinton – retracted his election night concession and subsequently convinced “three states with Democratic governors – North Carolina, Wisconsin and Michigan – to ask for recounts.” Then, the governors of Wisconsin and Michigan “sent separate slates of electors to counter those sent by the state legislature” to the Electoral College, which Trump had won, in an attempt to undermine, if not prevent, that win.

Next, “the Biden campaign encouraged Western states, particularly California but also Oregon and Washington, and collectively known as “Cascadia,” to secede from the Union unless Congressional Republicans agreed to a set of structural reforms. (emphasis added)” Subsequently, “with advice from [former] President Obama,” the Biden campaign laid out those “reforms” as the following:

  1. Give statehood to Washington, DC and Puerto Rico

  2. Divide California into five states “to more accurately represent its population in the Senate”

  3. Require Supreme Court justices to retire at 70

  4. Eliminate the Electoral College

In other words, these “structural reforms” involve the creation of what essentially amounts to having the U.S. by composed 56 states, with the new states set to ensure a perpetual majority for Democrats, as only Democrat-majority areas (DC, Puerto Rico and California) are given statehood. Notably, in other scenarios where Biden won the Electoral College, Democrats did not support its elimination. 

Also notable is the fact that, in this simulation, the TIP blamed the Trump campaign for the Democrats’ decision to take the “provocative, unprecedented actions” laid out above, asserting that Trump’s campaign had “created the conditions to force the Biden campaign” into taking these actions by doing things like giving “an interview to The Intercept in which he [Trump] stated that he would have lost the election if Bernie Sanders had been nominated” instead of Biden as the Democratic presidential candidate. 

The TIP also claimed that the Trump campaign would seek to paint these “provocative, unprecedented actions” as “the Democrats attempting to orchestrate an illegal coup,” despite the fact that that is essentially what those actions entail. Indeed, in other simulations where the Trump campaign behaved along these lines, the TIP’s rhetoric about this category of extreme actions is decidedly different.

Yet, the simulated actions of the Biden campaign in this scenario did not end there, as the Biden campaign subsequently “provoked a breakdown in the joint session of Congress [on January 6th] by getting the House of Representatives to agree to award the presidency to Biden,” adding that this was “based on the alternative pro-Biden submissions sent by pro-Biden governors.” The Republican party obviously did not consent, noting that Trump had won the election through his Electoral College victory. The “clear Trump win” election simulation ended with no president-elect being inaugurated on January 20, with the TIP noting “it was unclear what the military would do in this situation.” 

Of course, some TIP members, including its co-founder Rosa Brooks – a former advisor to the Obama era Pentagon and currently a fellow at the “New America” think tank, have their preference for “what the military would do in this situation.” For instance, Brooks, writing less than 2 weeks after Trump’s inauguration in 2017, argued in Foreign Policy that “a military coup, or at least a refusal by military leaders to obey certain orders” was one of four possibilities for removing Trump from office prior to the 2020 election.

I have enough trust in the military to say they are on Americas side. No other President has been more supportive to the military, through words and action, than Trump has. However, it is undeniable that his desire to get out of the Middle East has angered some Generals. Remember that preceding Trump were 28 years of Globalists rule in America. The Deep State runs very deep.

Hopefully the majority of Americans are aware of their sinister plans to regain power. But don't put it past the Deep State, the masterminds behind manipulation tactics, to do whatever it takes to win. President Trump needs as much support as possible in order to actually "Make America Great Again".

Get ready for a chaotic end to 2020.

My prediction? America wins, Globalists lose.

Full Document below

10 views0 comments